M. C. A. Hogarth ([info]haikujaguar) wrote,
@ 2007-09-10 14:39:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:tired
Current music:Apoptygma Beserk - Moment of Tranquility
Entry tags:ai-naidar, meta-conversations

Nothing to Hold You Down
They came back as unobtrusively as they left, my Ai-Naidar, though I am conscious of their solicitude as I attempt to recover and figure out some kind of workable schedule for the new few weeks. Still, I have time to puzzle over the latest of enigmas.

"I need to translate this word," I say. "I'm not finding anything."

It's Shame who glances at what I'm working on, then steps away to rest one shoulder against the door frame. "You could say the noble or regal caste, if you wished."

I shake my head. "That's not the same. That's a group of individuals. It's too personal."

"Then use Kherishdar," he suggests.

"That's the name of your empire," I say. "It's too specific."

He lifts a brow, hands folded over his chest. His tail twitches near the hem of his full pants, black hair against black silk. "I admit to a lack of understanding, aunerai. You wanted a word for those who... adjudicate? Reign? But you reject the caste names for those who do so. You do not want the name for empire, either. What exactly do you seek?"

I look at the word on the page. How do I explain the concept of a huge and impersonal abstraction to people who are ruled so personally? Everyone knows the name of their lord or lady, who sees them every year to mark them, who judges their disputes and assigns them their duties.... and their emperor has been with them since the founding. It's a whole different ball game when "The Man" is literal.

"I don't think you understand what I seek," I say, pen resting near the word: Government. "God knows how I'm going to explain it to anyone else."


Stardancer Home.



(Post a new comment)


[info]ysabel
2007-09-10 07:09 pm UTC (link)
...and I wonder just how baffling "bureaucracy" would be. Or maybe not, since bureaucracy can thrive even in little pockets in otherwise-sane systems.

(Reply to this)


[info]tuftears
2007-09-10 09:41 pm UTC (link)
Hmm, it makes me wonder if the word you're trying to match to an English concept might not be better likened to the Japanese honorifics? Or are you trying to match the English concept of 'authority' to an Ai-naidari word?

(Reply to this)


[info]stokerbramwell
2007-09-10 11:18 pm UTC (link)
So he did get pants after all. I am...bemused. XD

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]haikujaguar
2007-09-10 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Oh, the Calligrapher's still in robes. Shame always wore pants... his work makes that easier.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mauser
2007-09-11 02:38 am UTC (link)
"Them" or "They".

Sure, it's just a simple pronoun, but with the right inflection and intonation, it brings along all the baggage of Big Brother....

One of my favorite quotes from a book I never read by Stanislaus Lem was about how ""They" come and go, but the institution of "Theyness" continues."

Am fuller quote is on my other computer.

(Reply to this)


[info]eseme
2007-09-11 05:10 am UTC (link)
Oh good, they're back. I do love these little converstaions. And look forward to the chapbook, whenever your new responsibilities permit it.

(Reply to this)


[info]wolfbrotherjoe
2007-09-11 12:51 pm UTC (link)
If I understand correctly ...

You are having a problem in that you are simultaneously trying to explain to the Ai-Naidar about being ruled by people you don't know ...

And explain to Americans about being ruled by people you do?

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…