I had high-minded plans to paint tonight, but instead I got sucked into re-reading a really good book that I was planning to give a friend.
Which is out of print, though it came out in the late 90's.
Which I had to buy used, which put no money in the author's pocket, because I couldn't find a copy any other way.
In absence of a legitimate paper copy, I tried to find an electronic version and couldn't. I went to the publisher's website, which lists no information on how to contact them to tell them there's at least one reader who wants to
give them money for an e-book version. Or any version. Because no publisher would really care about whether readers want to buy copies of their backlists.
For maximum frustration and prevention-of-sales, the publisher's website doesn't even tell me how I can contact the author, so I can at least give
him money for a copy if he's got some extras in his garage.
Compounding this problem, the author has neither website nor any web presence at all that I can find. Because a man who won the Robert Heinlein medal, two Prometheus awards, a Seiun award, a Sturgeon award and received five Hugo award nominations
FOR HARD SCIENCE FICTION apparently doesn't do that internet technology thing.
When I was researching literary contracts in hopeful preparation for the time I'd need the knowledge (and I did need it, if only to turn down three horrendous offers), one of the things drummed into my head was how important the reversion clause was—the clause that allowed an author to get back their property if the publisher wasn't selling it—and I believed it.
But how, exactly, is this book making the author any money now?
That used copy? I bought it for
one cent.Try and tell me this industry isn't messed up. Please.
Stardancer Home.Tags: marketing, new publishing paradigms, technology, writing
Current Mood: seriously irritated